So not much to report this week. Been working a lot, but the Rambler has been running perfectly since I put the engine back together. After driving it a couple days I went back and checked all the bolts, and none had loosened. But I’ve been commuting all over LA county everyday and it has been running really good. One day we had a heat wave and it got up to about 98 degrees. I was in stop and go traffic for about an hour and a half and the temp guage got up to about the half-way point, and my oil pressure light came on. So I’m wondering what that could be. I have no idea how old the oil pump is. I’ve been running 10W-30 Quaker State, and I also add a little Marvel Mystery oil. So I’m wondering if it’s just thinning too much at that temp for the oil pump to pick it up as effectively. So I will be busy for the next week or so, but would like to hear any remedies some of you may have for that particular problem. I’ve also put my 1965 Dart GT up for sale. Tons of tire kickers but no real bites on it yet. Anyway be back next week with more.
Archive for April, 2008
Ramblin’ Man!!!!!!
April 25, 2008You’ve bought an old car, whatdya’ do now?
April 11, 2008Well….hmmm… There are so many paths you could take. I have three old cars. And all three will have had completely different approaches when they are finished. My first one was the 1968 Plymouth Valiant. It had a 273cid V-8. My plan was to build it up and hot-rod it a little while keeping it bone stock on the outside, dog-dish hub caps and all. The car cost me about $1000 to purchase, and another $8500 in restoration. All I had left to do was the interior, and it would have been 100% completed. But one night I had taken it to a car wash two blocks away to prepare for a car cruise the following day. On my way home a car load of teenagers plowed into me while I sat at a stop-light. So it now has a fair amount of damage and I’m now determining what to do with it. But that resto was mostly me paying for people to do the work. The only thing I did was sand and prep the body for paint.
During that time I stumbled on my 1965 Dodge Dart GT. It had the fairly rare factory high performance version of the 273cid. And the factory installed Hurst shifter. It was fairly worn out but original and untouched. So now I have that and it still runs, but I’m afraid to touch it. That car needs a full rotiserie top notch restoration. And will be valuable someday. And with all the GT trim, it’s a pretty involved project. And I want that car to be show car quality, factory correct, and all that. So for now I keep it running, and protected. And drive it once or twice a week.
So the Valiant was wrecked, and the Dart is a project for down the road when I have the money. So I needed something to drive. Thats when I found my Rambler. Bought it off an 18yr old kid for $900. The purpose was to have a simple car that got good gas mileage. And secondly that it be something I could restore myself. So that made the Rambler a really attractive project car. There was only one piece of trim below the rear window. Only a couple emblems, and very simple squarish and broad body panels. It is a uni-body, so the entire car is one piece. The only removable body panels are the front fenders. That means a lot less seams to negotiate when priming, sanding, and painting . And the engine is so simple it freaks me out. The instrument cluster in the dash is really simple, all the guages are mounted on a printed circuit board. So the whole intrument panel comes out as one piece with only a few wires to unplug. The upholstery is all vinyl with no designs or ornamentation. Its just two bench seats, and the doorpanels are wrapped in plain vinyl. The transmission is an automatic 3 speed Borg-Warner Flash-o-Matic. A very basic, air-cooled, straight ahead transmission.
There are no options on the car except that the engine was upgraded from the 199cid, to the 232cid. No power steering or power breaks. The breaks are self-adjusting drum type breaks with a dual resevoir master cylinder. So this is a car that I can handle most of the work myself. So lets look at cost. I paid $900 for the car , had the head machined and a valve job(but did all the removal and installation myself) for about $250 all together including new spark plugs, gaskets, radiator fluid, and spray paint. I paid $100 for a new exhaust manifold. About $60 in various fluids. About $240 in insurance for the year. And I titled and registered it for about $90. I’ve also spent another $100 or so in spray-paint primer, sand paper, bondo, etc.. So for a little less than $1900 I have a car thats in perfect running condition, primed, sanded and ready for paint. It is now my main source of transportation. Now I don’t intend to do a showroom quality restoration with this car, but I do plan on making it nice. What I have left to do is…. Paint, which I will do myself using rollers and Rustoleum for about $150(there are plenty of Forums with great info on the process). New tires eventually for around $250. I’m going to remove the front and back seats myself and take them to an upholstery shop. That will be about $150 per seat, since they are so basic. I will buy additional vinyl from the upholsterer and do the door pnels myself for about $50. And have the transmission rebuilt for about $600. I also recently had a new exhaust system put on for about $130. So for about $3400 I will have a clean mostly restored car.
There will always be little improvemnts here and there. But thats not much money for what I will have when I’m through. If I ever decided to sell it, I won’t have my life savings tied up in it. And I could probably make a tiny profit, and maybe get into something a little more advanced. I learned a lot from the Valiant, but would’ve never made my money back on that one. But it does take patience. And most things on these cars, while they can be time consuming, are not rocket science. But keep in mind almost everything I’ve mentioned can be done at home. And you don’t need much experience, don’t be intimidated. If you have a basic knowledge of how a car works, and a halfway decent set of sockets, wrenches, screwdrivers, pliers, and a hammer…. it can all be done. Next time we’ll talk about doing the body work and getting your car ready for paint. Do not be afraid!!!
Studebaker and AMC compacts (a brief history)
April 5, 2008I will try to keep this short and easy to read, but also informative. And hopefully this will be a simple guide you can refer to often, if you’re looking for an old car. The bulk of my knowledge is with Dodge/Plymotuh, and AMC. But I’ve been studying Studebakers, Chevy’s, and Fords along the way. I’ve tried to not use a lot of internet sources for my information. I’ve found some of them to be unreliable, although there are some that are invaluable as well. I try to use publications from the time period. I’ve found many old Motor Trend magazines (and others)that are full of great road test, and comparisons. Two really good issues to get a hold of are Motor Trend.. Dec, 1959– and — Oct, 1960.
The American manufacturers war of the compacts started in about 1959. Although there had been some efforts before that. But it was about 1960 before it really took off commercially. So out of the those cars it was the 1959 Studebaker Lark (and the Rambler, but thats next) that really kicked it off. It was offered in 2-door(post), 4-door, 2-door hardtop, and a 2-door station wagon. There were 2 trim levels, the Deluxe and the Regal. The Deluxe was the base model, and the Regal featured more trim and luxury items. Engines offered were a 170cid in-line six cylinder L-head. And unlike any of the bigger manufacturers, they offered a V-8 259cid(225hp). The V-8 seems to have rated very high in road tests done at the time. The 170cid six-cylinder is most likely what you’ll find though. This was an older Studebaker mill, and was refined a bit for modern fuels. It had great low-speed acceleration, but was not fast by any means. I personally love the engine, and the way it sounds. But it is a bit more difficult to source parts for than some the other more modern overhead-valve designs the other comapnies had. The Lark and it’s variations would last until 1966, when Studebaker finally went under. Through the years it came with many other trim packages, and drive-train options. In 1960 a convertible and a 4-door station wagon appeared. In 1962 the Lark Cruiser was offered as a more luxurious model, based on the longer wheel-base taxi frame. And could even be had with a fold-back canvas “sun-roof”. Also a bigger V-8 was available, the 289cid. It was primarily marketed as a ploice package, but could be ordered by the public too. And, lacking funds for a complete re-tooling, the 170cid L-head motor, was basically converted to an overhead valve design. In 1962 came the Lark Daytona(Larks actually ran well at the first Daytona 500 in 1959), it was to replace the Regal as the high-end product, although Regals were still available. The Daytona came with bucket seats, center console, etc.. The most noticeable change in 1962 was a change in the glass. The cars had thinner pillars, and flatter glass giving the interior a slightly roomier feel, and better visibility. Also the Standard series appeared. It was a completely stripped down model, with no trim, or options. Not even an emblem designating it as a Lark. It only had a Studebaker emblem. However for those “in the know” in 1963, you could order many more performance options than previously available. Things like disc brakes, and super-charged V-8’s. For the remainder of the Larks life it recieved a few name shuffles and additions. The Lark Challenger replaced replaced the low-cost Standard, and the Lark Commander replaced the Regal, and Custom lines. The Lark name eventually disappeared and left only the Studebaker Commander, and Challenger. By 1966 operations had moved to a single factory in Canada where the last car rolled off the line.
Next is the AMC Rambler. This can get confusing. Nash and Hudson had merged to become AMC in 1954. Initially the Rambler was sold under both Hudson and Nash names simultaneously in 1954-56. Then in 1959 it came back as it’s own marque(similar to Chryslers Dodge or Plymouth, etc.). AMC, In an effort to save money used the old mid-50’s tooling for the new model. The Rambler name was attatched to a whole host of AMC cars, large and small. But here we will focus on the compact Rambler American. It had a life-span from 1958-1969. The 1958 Rambler only came in a 2-door sedan version. The following year a 2-door station wagon would be added, and 1960 a 4-door sedan. All came with the 195.6 ohv in-line six engine. This was an incredibly basic and reliable engine. And has not recieved it’s due in the history books. It’s not a perfomance motor by any means. But it runs great, and it goes forever. And the basic design lasted in the Jeep until last year(2007). It also had the most horse-power of all the compacts intitially. The 2nd generation of the Rambler was from 1961-1963. It was identical mechanically, and chasis wise. But the body became more square. And a convertible became available. In 1963 a trim option called the 440-H had bucket seats with various sporty looking appointments, and a version of 195.6 motor that had a little more power. Also available was a 2-door coupe with no pillars. The third and last generation of the Rambler American was from 1964-1969. The cars became even more square, but sleek. And was a down-right cool looking car. And although AMC was late in the muscle car game you started seeing the little Rambler with some crazy high-performance options. All the while maintaining the economy treatments too. The 440 was still around, and new were the 330, and 220 trim designations. Also things like more advanced suspension came around. Also appearing on the scene was the new and venerable 232cid in line 6 cylinder engine. It was optional over the reworked 195.6cid(now a 199cid). It had 7 main bearings and was tough as a tank. By this time the body styles offered were 2-door coupe, 2-door post, 4-door sedan, 2-door convertible, and a 4-door station wagon. The 64-65 models featured a tunnel shaped front fender that looked like it extended off the headlights. Starting in 1966 the fender became completely sqarue. In 1966 the 440-H was renamed the Rogue. A new 290cid V-8 “Typhoon” was available mid-year. The 330 trim package was dropped also. Cool things started happening in 1967 with the Rambler American. In the Rogue and 440 you could order the 343cid V-8. And over the next couple years the Rambler American would be offered in less and less options. When in 1969, it’s last year, The name American was dropped. And it was just a Rambler. BUT!!! A magical car sprung from the Rogue package called the S/C Rambler “Scrambler”. These cars were assembled by Hurst Performance, and treated to some of the coolest “upgrades” ever. It had AMC’s 315hp 390cid V-8, a Hurst shifter attatched to a manual 4-speed that spun a “Twin Grip” rear-end. Also a massive and unique hood-scoop that looked like a mail-box, a Sun tachometer strapped to the steering column. And a bitchin’ red, white, and blue paint scheme(actually two paint schemes “A” and “B”). They only made a little over 1,500. But man what a car!(The first Rambler was built in 1902, by the Thomas B. Jeffery Company, a predecessor to Nash. So, there is quite a bit of previous Rambler history to dig into).
Now you have the basics for those cars, there are a lot more sources with way more detail on many web-sites. But I hope this helped give you a basic understanding of how those cars came and went. Next time I will be discussing the Plymouth/Dodge A-bodies(Valiants/Lancers/Darts/Demons/Dart Sports/ Dusters/ Scamps/Swingers). So if you’re shopping, don’t make up your mind yet. We still have Fords and Chevy’s to tackle too.













